Pulse XE Custom Parts


  • Global Moderator

    I have been redesigning a few parts, ok, a lot of parts on the Pulse. I will try to get them uploaded to my Github page later.

    These are the upper left and right Z-axis brackets. I have removed all of the lower support and have added it to the top so that the T8 lead screw nut can press into the top and yield slightly more print area. The left mount is also wider so that a stop switch can be used instead of the panda switch. Panda switches are not as reliable as micro switches. Plus when the Panda switch fails, it tends to burn the control board, which is what happened to me. *One of the things that can happen is that you lose your ground to the probe. When this happens current is shunted through the probe and into the board. I had quite the discussion with the Duet engineers explaining this.

    I have been using these new top supports for awhile now and they work great.

    Sliced in MatterControl, with new multi layer brims.

    Polycarbonate Filament used in this progect can be purchased here

    alt text
    alt text


  • Global Moderator

    Other than the brim printing weird, the parts look great. These are printed in polycarbonate. Why use Polycarbonate instead of petg? Polycarbonate has the characteristics of PETG for printer parts, but it will handle much higher temperatures in a heated chamber. Unfortunately though, polycarbonate warps when you try to print it. Additional geometry is required to hold it down to the print bed. This is why a brim is needed. Sometimes even with a brim, the pull forces are enough to rip the part from it's brim. It is for this reason we use multiple layered brims to increase the Brim-to-part adhesion.

    These parts are very strong. They might be able to be modified to be used with the original panda sensor probe, but a hole will need to be drilled in the end and a cap-screw added for the sensor to find.

    alt text
    alt text

    The top looks sunken, but it is just an optical illusion.


  • Global Moderator

    My friends on my Discord channel said that I was over extruding. I have the extrusion for the first layer down 90% and the additional layers down 85%. Another friend said that I had the nozzle down to far. I do have the nozzle down because you have to push PC into the Garolite bed to get it to stick. But the first layer is relatively clean printing, its the additional brim layers which are messy, flaky or gooey.

    alt text

    You can see here, the first layer of the brim looks good.

    alt text

    If you look closely, the first layer of the part looks much better than the outer brim.


  • Global Moderator

    Next I will manually make a brim.

    **This part is my new motor mount on the X axis. This will be dual linear rails instead of dual LM8UU rods.

    Since my multi layer brim is 0.2mm X 3 layers = 0.6mm, I will make a 0.6mm manually made brim around the part.

    alt text

    The difference is that I believe the slicer sees the brim here as actual part material and not Brim material. So it is my theory, it should print the new outer part differently.


  • Global Moderator

    The manually made brim printed clean and smooth as the rest of the part. For some reason the geometry or method used to create a brim is different than making the rest of part. I personally do not understand the programming behind what makes the brim different from the actual part's geometry.

    alt text
    alt text


  • Global Moderator

    Maybe this is the reason why other slicer teams use multiple skirt layers instead of multiple brim layers? Here I am just guessing, both brim and skirt layers seem to be the same. However, the skirt layers seem to look much different when printing than the brim for some reason. When my part finishes printing, I will be able to take closer pictures.


  • Global Moderator

    Needs a little Dremel work on the inside, but otherwise solid. Stuck really well to the build plate.

    alt text

    In the background on the left you can see my Duet3D mini 5+ enclosure. I need to revisit that project and print in PC.

    alt text

    alt text

    alt text

    These are the same exact settings that produced this. The difference is that this last image is using the automatic brim, and the previous three images are using a mechanical brim which I created and put under the model.


  • Global Moderator

    This is the X axis idler. I switched to a round brim. I actually forgot to check if I had enough filament. If not, its a good practice round. (I print remotely over the network. The printer is in a separate building.)

    alt text

    alt text



  • What build plate is that, what are your settings for the prints


  • Global Moderator

    @jacob5421 It is Garolite, you can purchase from MatterHackers. This is 0.25mm layer height, 25mm/s.


  • Global Moderator

    These come out great for polycarbonate. I can't expect PLA or petg quality. These are stronger and will resist higher heat than petg.

    alt text


  • Global Moderator

    This time I used a raft without an air gap.

    @tinken


  • Global Moderator

    I decided it was time to replace the Y-axis idler pulley. I don't want to remove it without a replacement, I can see that the bearings are already worn. The pulley on there now is a 6mm wide with a 3mm bearing ID. I want to get a little better pulley.

    alt text

    alt text

    These are 9mm pulleys. The one on the left is Chinese made. The one on the right is made by Gates.

    alt text

    Gates uses a 5mm ID high quality bearing. These will last for years without maintenance.

    alt text

    But there is no way the Gates will fit in the original pulley bracket...

    **Note: I have modified my X-axis belt tension slider to accept the larger Gates pulley. I will have to order new stainless steel 5mm x 16mm shafts.


  • Global Moderator

    I modified the bracket. It didn't need to be wider, but it did need to be taller. Also the base seemed to be overly thick. I increased the height of the bracket by 5mm, then removed 5mm of material from the base. Increased hole openings from 3mm to 5mm.

    alt text

    alt text

    The finished part looks good. I will have to wait for my new pulleys to come in to test.


  • Global Moderator

    I have modified the back plate a little, shortened it added rigidity across the top. I will need to redesign a little and make sure it mounts up to the pulse hotend mount. I may add the new hotswap mount.

    This mounts to the MGN 9 and MGN 7 Rail bearings.

    alt text



  • Dang!

    What will be left that's original?

    Looks like you are using your Pulse to replace itself.

    Great post by the way.



  • @tinken this is just the part I've been looking for. is it possible to get the STL or a link for it from you? Have you finished your MGN 9 rail conversion? I'm really interested in the performance of this upgrade.

    Edit: To clarify, I'm interested in the STL for the Y axis pulley bracket for the 9mm Gates pulley


  • Global Moderator

    @csenior10 Sure I will upload it to Thingiverse or Prusaprinters as time permits. I am currently working on new BLtouch armor files. This is something I think is very important for the Pulse.


  • Global Moderator



  • @tinken you rock!!! Thank you. sounds great. I cant wait to see the BL Touch mod


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to MatterHackers Community was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.